Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2022-02-25 | 2017-06-20 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-T880 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than Galaxy J7 Max, having a 95.4 score against 76.1. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has older 13 version while Galaxy J7 Max has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Galaxy S22 Ultra design is much newer than Galaxy J7 Max's, but it's just a little bit thicker and way heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy J7 Max, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, more pixels per screen inch and a bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light images and video, it also counts with a back camera with way more MP and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a 52% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.