Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is much better than Galaxy M20's 78.9 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a somewhat heavier device than Galaxy M20, but both are 0.35inches thick. Both phones we are comparing work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Galaxy M20 has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy M20, because it has a quite greater display density, a little bit bigger display and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Galaxy M20 has a quite bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy M20, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a way larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality, a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light images and videos.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra and the Galaxy M20 count with similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.