Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 84.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-03-23 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Midnight blue and Raven black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is better than Galaxy M21's 84.1 general score. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a somewhat heavier device than Galaxy M21, but both of them are 0.35inches thick. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Galaxy M21 has Android 11.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features just a little better processing power than Galaxy M21, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy M21, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, way more brightness, a little bit bigger screen and a just a little better amount of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior camera than Galaxy M21, because it has a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger camera aperture for better low light images and a way better 108 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy M21 features a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M21 has improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.