Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is better than Galaxy M30's score of 82.4. Both devices in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version and Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy S22 Ultra design is extremely newer, but a little thicker and noticeably heavier than the Galaxy M30.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better display than Galaxy M30, because it has a greater display density, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a bit larger display. Galaxy M30 has a very superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy M30 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit better performance than Galaxy M30, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy M30's battery duration is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra one. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs, a lot better video resolution and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.