Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is better than Samsung Galaxy M40's overall score of 85. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is incredibly newer, but noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy M40. These devices have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy M40 has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better screen than Galaxy M40, because it has a little larger screen, a just a bit higher number of pixels in each display inch and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Galaxy M40 counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M40 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing images and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a lot better resolution camera in the back and a way bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a very superior battery life than Galaxy M40, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.