Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 501 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M51's overall score of 87.7. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Samsung Galaxy M51 has Android 10, so it provides you some additional features and performance enhancements. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is newer and a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy M51's, although it is a bit heavier.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a higher display pixels density.
Galaxy M51 features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy M51 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much higher video quality, a way more megapixels back facing camera and a lot larger sensor which offers a way better image and video quality.
The Galaxy M51 has a much better battery performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.