Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 20's score of 90.8. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, although it's just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy Note 20, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a little larger display and a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the same 24 fps video frame rates and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much bigger sensor and a much better resolution back camera.
The Galaxy Note 20's memory for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to Galaxy S22 Ultra's one, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra costs more money than Galaxy Note 20, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.