Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, with a global score of 95.4 against 79.3. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is a lot newer, but somewhat thicker and a lot heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note 5. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 7 more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a slightly better screen than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger screen and a little higher 1440 x 3088px resolution.
Galaxy S22 Ultra takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality, a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos in low light environments, a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is way more expensive than the Galaxy Note 5, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.