Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 global score. Even though Galaxy S22 Ultra is incredibly newer than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it is extremely heavier and somewhat thicker. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more vivid screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a quite inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a larger display.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a much better video quality, a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.