Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is better than Galaxy Note10 Lite's 86.2 general score. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Galaxy Note10 Lite has Android 11 version, so it gives some additional features. Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is way newer than the Galaxy Note10 Lite, it's a bit thicker and heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has a better pixels quantity in each inch in the display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a quite larger screen. The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy S22 Ultra takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, it also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality, a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.