Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a little bit better than the Galaxy S10 Lite, with a global score of 95.4 against 89.7. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer device than the Galaxy S10 Lite, although it is somewhat heavier and a little thicker. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a better quantity of pixels per inch of display, a bit larger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM and 8 cores. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a better camera than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations, a lot better video resolution, a much larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures and a much more MP back camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.