Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S10e's global score of 86.3. The Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is newer, but way heavier and thicker than Samsung Galaxy S10e. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy S10e, because it has a just a little higher pixel density, a larger display and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Galaxy S10e counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh. The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a way more MP back-facing camera and a way larger sensor.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy S10e, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy S10e. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S22 Ultra, otherwise you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy S10e, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.