Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, getting a 95.4 score against 89.1. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has Android 11, giving some extra features. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, it must be noted that it is also a way heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better display than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a just a little better display density and a quite bigger screen.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much better video definition and a way more mega pixels back camera. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has as much memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as Galaxy S22 Ultra, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy S21 FE, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S21 FE. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy S21 FE, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.