Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's general score of 75.8. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is much newer and thinner, but heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a little inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a really brighter display, a little bit higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a really larger screen.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 108 MP resolution back-facing camera and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.