Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is much better than the Galaxy XCover 5's overall score of 78.1. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra body is newer and a little thinner than the Galaxy XCover 5's, although it's way heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11 version, so it provides some extra features and performance tweaks.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a lot better looking screen than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a lot better pixel amount per inch of screen and a larger screen.
Galaxy XCover 5 has a superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot better resolution back camera and a way better video quality.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.