Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 12 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is much better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's general score of 77.6. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12, giving a couple nice extra features and enhanced performance. Even when the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and Galaxy XCover 6 Pro were released with only a couple of months difference, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better performing processor than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a higher pixel density, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a little larger screen.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 23% greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a back camera with a much higher resolution and a much larger back camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.