Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 501 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 global score. Both devices in this review come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer phone, and it is also thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a better looking screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a way bigger display.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a better storage for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures in low light situations, it also counts with a back camera with much more MP, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a little more money than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.