Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's 88.5 global score. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a much newer phone than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, but it is somewhat thicker and much heavier. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12, providing a couple additional features and performance optimizations.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better CPU than Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a quite bigger screen, a quite better display pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, a much higher video quality and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.