Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy Z Flip 3, with a 95.4 score against 85.6. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11, offering a couple additional features and enhanced performance. Although it's the best phone in this review, it must be told that it is also extremely thicker and incredibly heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit better processing power than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a just a little higher pixels amount per inch of screen and a little bit larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with as much storage capacity to store more games and applications as Galaxy S22 Ultra, both of them have equal internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra costs more than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.