Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, getting a 95.4 score against 94.6. Both devices in this review have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has Android 11 version, providing some additional features and optimized performance. Even though Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, it's lighter and newer.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels count per inch of screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with much more storage for apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a back camera with a much better resolution and a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.