Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is slightly better than Galaxy Z Fold 3's score of 90.6. Although the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and the Galaxy Z Fold 3 were released with only 7 months difference, Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction is way thicker but somewhat lighter. Both devices in this review have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and Galaxy Z Fold 3 has Android 11 version.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a higher display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.