Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-02-25 | -- |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a bit better than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, having a overall score of 95.4 against 91.1. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version while Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has Android 14 version. The Galaxy S22 Ultra body is thicker but just a little bit lighter than the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a bit smaller screen and way less brightness, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a greater quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a much less megapixels back camera, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Galaxy S22 Ultra is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.