Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-02-25 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact, with a 95.4 score against 79. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the older 13 version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction is way newer and incredibly thinner, but also way heavier than the Xperia XZ2 Compact.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a bit better looking screen than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, much more brightness, a little bit better pixels density and a much bigger display.
Xperia XZ2 Compact features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 400 GB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a superior battery life than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much clearer photographs and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and videos, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a much higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.