Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, with a 95.4 score against 82.2. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is notably newer, a bit lighter and noticeably thinner than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium. Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller display and way less brightness, it also counts with much more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 2160 x 3840 resolution.
Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 400 GB. Xperia XZ2 Premium features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better camera than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better battery life than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3540mAh.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is more expensive than the Xperia XZ2 Premium, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.