Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, having a score of 95.4 against 76.1. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is newer and a little thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the TCL 20 Pro 5G. Both devices we compare here include Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11 version, so it provides the user lots of additional features and better performance.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better looking screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, more pixels per screen inch and a little larger screen. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit faster CPU than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit superior battery life than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a way better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.