Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2022-02-25 | 2018-04-20 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Black Shark, getting a overall score of 95.4 against 80.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is somewhat heavier than Xiaomi Black Shark, it's a little bit thinner and notably newer. Both phones we compare here use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has older 13 version while Xiaomi Black Shark has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 8 GB RAM memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a just a bit better pixels count per display inch, a little bigger display, a really brighter screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088.
The Xiaomi Black Shark features as much storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, they have the same internal storage. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with better battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot larger sensor capturing lot higher quality photos and videos, a back camera with much more mega pixels and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.