Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is better than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's general score of 82.9. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction has the same thickness than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, but it is somewhat heavier. Both devices in our current comparison use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has older 13 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a quite larger display, much more brightness and a just a little greater pixel density. The Galaxy S22 Ultra and the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro both feature similar memory for games and applications, both have the same internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much bigger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photos, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has longer battery life than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.