Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is much better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3's 86.6 score. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has Android 10 version, providing you some extra features. The Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is newer and thinner, but also a bit heavier than Xiaomi Black Shark 3.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has an incredibly better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a little bigger display. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 8 GB of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has as much storage for games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra one, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way better image and video quality.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.