Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Blasting black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's 90.1 general score. Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is newer and thinner, but also a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a sharper screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1440 x 3088 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixels number in each display inch. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 8 GB RAM.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and photographs, a camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a battery duration that's just as good as the battery lifetime in Galaxy S22 Ultra.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.