Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, having a general score of 95.4 against 82.7. These devices have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10 version, offering a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a heavier phone than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, but they are equally thin.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit better performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a bit better pixel density, a little bit bigger display, a lot brighter screen and a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much larger sensor taking much higher quality photos and videos, a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a way better video resolution.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features as much storage capacity for games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, both have the same internal memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with improved battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.