Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Blue, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is way better than the Xiaomi Mi A3's global score of 79.2. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra body is extremely newer, but a little bit thicker and way heavier than the Xiaomi Mi A3. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Xiaomi Mi A3 has Android 11 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features and increased performance.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better display than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a way better pixel count per inch of display and a little bigger display. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi A3 has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots way better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor, a camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot higher video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has improved battery performance than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.