Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is way better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2's 77.5 general score. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is way newer, but just a little heavier and thicker than Xiaomi Mi Max 2. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a greater pixel density, a bit larger screen and a much higher 1440 x 3088px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a bigger aperture for better low light captures, a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Mi Max 2 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 128 GB. Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 5300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Mi Max 2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.