Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-08-10 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White and Shadow Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (480 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, getting a general score of 95.4 against 89. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4. These devices include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has Android 11, providing the user some nice extra features.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a greater screen density.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4's storage for games and applications is just as good as the Galaxy S22 Ultra one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra and Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 both have quite similar cameras, and although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos and videos in low light situations, they both have a back camera with a 108 mega pixels, the same video definition, the same video frame rate and a same size back camera sensor.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.