Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-09-24 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 8.50 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2250 x 2088 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 108.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, having a score of 95.4 against 88.9. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has Android 10, giving some extra features and performance optimizations. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is newer, just a bit lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features greater battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photos or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same resolution back facing camera and a 0.75 inches camera sensor, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.