Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-04-16 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 11.18 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black and Ceramic |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 1860 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 388 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 80.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, getting a general score of 95.4 against 79.8. Both phones in this comparison come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has Android 10 version, providing you a couple additional features and some performance improvements. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is newer and notably lighter, but also somewhat thicker than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1440 x 3088, it also counts with a much brighter screen and more pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much greater processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold and Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra count with very similar batteries duration, although the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold also has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold. They have a back-facing camera with a 108 mega pixels and the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.