Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, having a 95.4 score against 84.3. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has Android 14. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a notably older, a lot thicker and a little bit heavier phone than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has a just a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a little bit higher 2224 x 2488 resolution, much more brightness and a larger display. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra captures slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video definition and the same 24 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also counts with a bigger back camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality and a much higher 108 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a 2 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.