Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2022-02-25 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, having a 95.4 score against 76. Both devices in our current comparison have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Even though the Galaxy S22 Ultra is newer than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, it is way heavier and thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better display than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a way better 1440 x 3088px resolution, a larger screen and a greater screen pixel density. Xiaomi Mi Note 2's memory for apps and games is just as good as Galaxy S22 Ultra's one, both of them have exactly the same internal storage.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more processing cores. Galaxy S22 Ultra has better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes a lot better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a larger camera aperture for better low light images and videos, a lot higher video resolution, a much better resolution back-facing camera and a much larger sensor.
Galaxy S22 Ultra is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.