Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | -- |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's overall score of 86.1. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has Android 11 version, providing the user some additional features.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a brighter display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1440 x 3088, it also counts with a bit greater pixel density and a little bit larger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features as much storage capacity to install applications and games as Galaxy S22 Ultra, both have the same 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have a back camera with a 108 mega-pixels, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a larger diafragm aperture.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a 3% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.