Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 12 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, having a 95.4 score against 91.5. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has Android 12 version, giving a couple nice extra features and enhanced performance. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a a little heavier cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, but both have the same thickness.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a brighter screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has a quite bigger screen, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a much brighter screen and more pixels per screen inch.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer takes clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has a smaller camera sensor, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also counts with better video frame rate, a larger aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a much more MP back-facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has more internal storage. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.