Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2022-02-25 | 2018-02-22 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, getting a 95.4 score against 75.8. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is way newer than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, it's a bit thicker and a lot heavier. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a little bit higher screen pixel density, a little larger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features longer battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes a lot better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels, a much better video quality and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.