Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's 83 global score. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10 version, providing the user some nice extra features. The Galaxy S22 Ultra design is newer and a little thinner, but heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has an incredibly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a little bit larger display, a better display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a better memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's processor is just as good as the Galaxy S22 Ultra one, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a battery lifetime that is very similar to the Galaxy S22 Ultra one. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a camera with a much better 108 mega pixels resolution and a much larger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.