Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is much better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro's 80.2 overall score. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10, so it provides you some nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is newer, but noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker than ZTE Axon 10 Pro.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an incredibly better display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a little larger display, a greater display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has longer battery life than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra captures a lot better photographs and videos than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much more megapixels back camera and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more money than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.