Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than ZTE Axon 20, having a global score of 95.4 against 77.8. Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is newer than ZTE Axon 20, it is heavier and thicker. These devices include Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and ZTE Axon 20 has Android 10. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better looking screen than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a better count of pixels per inch in the display.
ZTE Axon 20 features as much storage capacity for games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, both of them have the same internal memory capacity. ZTE Axon 20 features a bit better processor than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 processing cores. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has longer battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a superior camera than ZTE Axon 20, because it has a much larger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a camera in the back with a much better 108 megapixels resolution and a bigger aperture for better images and videos in low-light situations.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is way more expensive than ZTE Axon 20, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.