Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, having a global score of 95.4 against 78.1. Despite being the best in this comparison, Galaxy S22 Ultra is a somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has Android 11.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a little better performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have 8 CPU cores and 8 GB of RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a lot better display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, a bit larger screen and a better count of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots better photographs and videos than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing pictures or video in low light environments and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also counts with a much more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy S22 Ultra and ZTE Axon 30 Ultra have very similar storage for applications, games, photos and videos, both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a bit better battery duration than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.