Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is much better than the Google Pixel 2 XL, having a 93.4 score against 82.5. The Galaxy S22 design is extremely newer, just a little thinner and just a little lighter than the Google Pixel 2 XL. The Galaxy S22 features a little faster processor than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S22 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S22 features a more vivid display than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little lower screen density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. Galaxy S22 and Google Pixel 2 XL count with similar storage capacity to install applications and games, they have exactly the same internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 5% greater battery size. Galaxy S22 takes way better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 also has a much larger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera with a way higher 50 MP resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 2 XL. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel 2 XL, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.