Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is a bit better than the Google Pixel 5, with a 93.4 score against 89. The Galaxy S22 construction is newer and just a little bit thinner, but also just a bit heavier than the Google Pixel 5. The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a brighter display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a bit larger display.
Google Pixel 5 counts with as much storage for games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy S22 one, both have the same internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 5 and Galaxy S22 have extremely similar processing units, they have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Galaxy S22 counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photographs or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot higher video definition, a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a way bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4080mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 5, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 5. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel 5, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.