Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-11-23 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is a lot better than the LG K52, with a 93.4 score against 76. The Galaxy S22 construction is newer, somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than the LG K52. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version while LG K52 has Android 10 version, giving you some extra features.
Galaxy S22 counts with a much sharper screen than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a much higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen. Galaxy S22 counts with a bit superior processing unit than LG K52, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S22 captures way better pictures and videos than LG K52, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 also has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot bigger back camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality and a camera with more MP. The LG K52 has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG K52 counts with just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has an 8% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.