Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is better than LG K62, having a 93.4 score against 78.2. Both devices in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version while LG K62 has Android 10 version. The Galaxy S22 design is newer, just a little thinner and lighter than the LG K62.
Galaxy S22 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than LG K62, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy S22 has a much more vibrant display than LG K62, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a much better number of pixels per inch of screen.
LG K62 counts with much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG K62 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG K62 features just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Galaxy S22 has a very superior camera than LG K62, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 also has a much bigger sensor taking way higher quality photographs, a higher 50 megapixels resolution back camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.