Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is a bit better than LG K92, having a general score of 93.4 against 85.4. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 has a newer 13 version and LG K92 has Android 10. The Galaxy S22 body is newer, lighter and just a little bit thinner than LG K92. The Galaxy S22 counts with a way better screen than LG K92, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher count of pixels per inch in the display.
LG K92 has a very superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S22 features a bit superior CPU than LG K92, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The LG K92 features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S22 has a bit better camera than LG K92, because although it has a camera with a way worse 50 megapixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a way higher video resolution.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG K92. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get LG K92, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.