Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-02-25 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is better than the LG V30S ThinQ, getting a 93.4 score against 82.5. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 has an older 13 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo. Samsung Galaxy S22's construction is noticeably newer, but a bit heavier and a little bit thicker than LG V30S ThinQ.
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a brighter display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a way lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a little lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a little bit larger display. The LG V30S ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V30S ThinQ's processor is very similar to the processing unit in Galaxy S22, and although the LG V30S ThinQ has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy S22 takes much clearer pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a lot higher video quality, a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a much bigger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has just a little better battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy S22 is also the cheapest one, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.